data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6f37/a6f3780212dfcbdb9aa438a2689ad20ffe1e0a30" alt="Microsoft excel assessment linkedin answers"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a06b/1a06b64b6b852b09f1c240b4715ed9dc1ba1ccea" alt="microsoft excel assessment linkedin answers microsoft excel assessment linkedin answers"
- #Microsoft excel assessment linkedin answers how to#
- #Microsoft excel assessment linkedin answers code#
- #Microsoft excel assessment linkedin answers simulator#
How the hell did I manage that? A combination of quick Googling, guesswork and the old pub quiz machine classic: looking at what the answers have in common and picking ones with similar words to each other.Īnyway, I've tasted (very low-level) fraud and I like it. Any hopes that it might be about buying suspiciously cheap books are quickly dashed as I'm hit with questions involving more brackets and symbols than any sentence should ever have. Nonetheless, like a problem gambler, I take my first shot, starting at the very top of the list with Amazon Web Services. Fortunately, there are 29 tests to take which increases the odds somewhat because… you know what, let's just add probability to the long list of skills I don't have and move on, shall we? Even to get half marks, it's around a one per cent chance. With 15 four-answer questions, relying on pure guesswork, I stand less than a 0.0001 per cent of getting every one right.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af898/af898bef9393661025e786ef00a3c67bfa417e3e" alt="microsoft excel assessment linkedin answers microsoft excel assessment linkedin answers"
That's a problem, because even with multiple-choice, the odds aren't in my favour.
#Microsoft excel assessment linkedin answers code#
Tigran was helped by a knowledge of some code which made the answers Googlable within the 90-second time limit: for me, I'd barely be able to read the acknowledgements page of the Coding for Dummies.
#Microsoft excel assessment linkedin answers how to#
The trouble is that almost all the tests are about coding, and the only bit of code I know is how to add HTML links: a skill I occasionally have to look up if I haven't done it in a while. When you have 1,000 candidates that you're trying to choose from, six to 10 per cent is like 60 to 100 people who are completely unqualified, right?" Following in Tigran's footsteps "Even if this is like 10 per cent of the population, right, or six per cent. How many people would cheat on a LinkedIn test? It doesn't really have to be a big number to make a difference.
#Microsoft excel assessment linkedin answers simulator#
'You know what to do when you have to crash land?' 'Of course, I do.'" Unsurprisingly, that's not how flight schools do things: "no, you put them in a flight simulator and see if they can do the job." 'You know where the cockpit is?' 'Sure, it's in the middle of that thing'. "Let's imagine you're hiring a pilot who's going to fly your plane and you just ask some multiple-choice questions about flying. Multiple choice is not just easy to game: it's not hugely helpful either, which is why brain surgeons aren't handpicked via a Facebook personality quiz. "They were asking their friends to do it for them, they were posting questions online." he recalls. And he knows this for sure, because CodeSignal had exactly the same problem at first, even with far more rigorous tests that required applicants to demonstrate their coding skills. "The only way assessments are going to be successful is if they can be trusted," he continues. Initially, he was excited by LinkedIn's arrival in this space, but that quickly evaporated: "I'm like, 'oh my God, this is not going to work'," he recalls. To be clear, Sloyan has a not-particularly-vested interest in this area: After leaving Google, he set up CodeSignal which specialises in exactly the kind of accreditation that LinkedIn is now pursuing. "Even things like QuickBooks that I've never touched in my life: I've got a passing grade now," he tells me via telephone. Although the former Googler is undoubtedly qualified, by his own admission he's not that qualified. Tigran Sloyan has 11 LinkedIn Skill Assessment badges on his profile with certificates in everything from C++ to MySQL. There's only one problem: it's incredibly easy to cheat.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9632c/9632cee1521d0adf953efd1ce397d0cd62cff8c5" alt="microsoft excel assessment linkedin answers microsoft excel assessment linkedin answers"
If you fail, well that's just between you and Microsoft. If you pass, you get a badge for your profile, one which the company says makes you 30 per cent more likely to get hired. The idea is that you prove your ability by taking a quick quiz.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6dfff/6dfff09172d2c361494a502fe336c747a110b6c4" alt="microsoft excel assessment linkedin answers microsoft excel assessment linkedin answers"
So now LinkedIn has another idea: Skill Assessments. That utopian ideal, that former colleagues could vouch for your skills in C++ or PowerPoint, was somewhat undermined by them preferring to praise their coworkers for the quality of their hugs and coffee-making abilities instead. For someone who is "comfortable with Excel," I look suspiciously panicked when asked to do anything more complex than calculate the sum of a column.įor some, though, the CV is a complete work of fiction, which is why LinkedIn introduced endorsements. THERE AREN'T ANY lies on my CV, but there is one thing that is, at best, a bit of an exaggeration.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6f37/a6f3780212dfcbdb9aa438a2689ad20ffe1e0a30" alt="Microsoft excel assessment linkedin answers"